Skip to content
The Classic Partners LLP ยท Transfer Pricing

Benchmarking Analysis

Identifying genuinely comparable transactions or companies to test whether your related-party pricing is at arm's length.

Quick answer

Benchmarking analysis involves searching recognised databases for comparable uncontrolled transactions or companies, applying qualitative and quantitative filters to arrive at a defensible comparable set, and computing the arm's length margin or price range. The reliability of your entire transfer pricing position depends heavily on how rigorously the comparables are selected and how well the search process is documented for scrutiny.

What we cover

What benchmarking analysis involves

A defensible benchmarking exercise is as much about the search process and filters as it is about the final margin.

  • Defining search criteria aligned with the FAR analysis and tested party
  • Running database searches across recognised commercial databases
  • Applying qualitative filters to exclude functionally dissimilar entities
  • Applying quantitative filters (related-party sales, persistent losses, etc.)
  • Computing the arm's length range or point estimate
  • Documenting the full search process for audit trail purposes
Key components

What this service includes

How we run your benchmarking exercise.

๐Ÿ”Ž

Database Search

Running structured searches on recognised databases to identify potential comparables.

๐Ÿงน

Filter Application

Applying qualitative and quantitative filters to refine the comparable set.

๐Ÿ“

Margin Computation

Calculating the arm's length range or point using accepted profit level indicators.

๐Ÿ“

Search Documentation

Recording every filter and rejection reason to support the process if questioned.

How we work

Our process

From initial consultation to completion.

1

Search Strategy Design

Setting search parameters based on industry, geography and functional profile.

2

Database Search & Filtering

Running the search and applying qualitative and quantitative filters.

3

Comparable Finalisation

Arriving at a defensible set of comparable companies or transactions.

4

Margin & Range Computation

Calculating the arm's length outcome and comparing it to your actual results.

Why choose us

Why the search process matters as much as the result

What sets our approach apart.

Filters need to be justifiable, not just applied

Every exclusion โ€” related-party sales, persistent losses, diminishing revenue โ€” needs a documented, defensible reason.

A too-narrow or too-broad set both raise questions

Getting the comparable set size and composition right is a judgment call that authorities frequently probe.

Outcomes can shift materially with small filter changes

Small changes in filters can move the arm's length range meaningfully, so sensitivity needs to be understood upfront.

FAQs

Benchmarking analysis questions answered

What people ask before engaging us.

Recognised commercial databases covering company financials and transaction data, selected based on data availability for the relevant industry and geography.
A financial ratio, such as operating margin or return on assets, used to compare the tested party's profitability against comparables.
There's no fixed number in law, but a reasonably sized, well-justified set is generally preferred over either a very small or an overly broad one.
Multi-year data use is permitted under specific rules, but the search itself should still be refreshed periodically to reflect current market conditions.

Get a defensible benchmarking analysis in place.

Let our team help you navigate this process with clarity and confidence.

Scroll to Top